Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4
Nov 24, 2013 8:00am PST
? >> reporter: that's going to be a problem going forward. it just seems that this administration, u.s. administration, has accepted it. they're going to disagree with two of their arguably closest allies in the region, saudi arabia and israel lobbying against this deal leading up to it and now as you saw today netanyahu saying the world is a more dangerous place today than it was where kerry says the exact opposite. it's safer. u.s. officials keep going back to the talking point that this is just a tactical disagreement with israel but it's a fundamental tactical disagreement here because in effect the u.s. is saying we can make a deal with iran. we can if it's verifiable trust iran and iranians and saudis saying the opposite. you can't trust them. that's a serious disagreement. you don't see how they reconcile that going forward so you know administration going through this next phase, longer term phase, is going to face similar harder opposition. >> real source of tension right now between the united states and israel. obama administration and government prime minister netanyahu. ji
Nov 3, 2013 8:00am PST
the way in which the murdoch press against which you used to compete operates? >> well, i guess when you cover the u.k. press, which i used to as a media correspondent, you're sort of aware there are a series of practices that people talk about but you never really see them exposed. as peter was saying, the way that the press operated in stark truth and in other words going into minister's offices saying we know you're having an affair and seeing back story of how widespread this was, you know, that's shocking even if you knew about it. the other thing which has been very surprising in the past two years is how much impact it's had on overall press in the u.k. there's been a great deal of debate and finally a conclusion as to how the press should no longer be regulated but regulated from if you like a royal by parliament and that's a huge change. there's been a very tumultuous period in british journalism. it hasn't quite reached here in the way we thought it would. >> restrictions you describe that have been proposed beaten around by various political figures there and various press ind
Nov 10, 2013 8:00am PST
recovery. the historical average in the u.s. has been around 6%. thanks for being part of my program this week. i'll see you next week. stay tuned for "reliable sources." >>> for a week amid growing doubts, cbs' "60 minutes" stood behind the interview of a security official that told of a harrowing experience during the attack in benghazi but on friday, laura logan admitted her story had fallen apart. >> well, you know, the most important thing to every person at "60 minutes" is the truth and today the truth is that we made a mistake. >> we'll look at what went wrong. the effort to expose the mistake, the implications for cbs news and the debate over what really happened in benghazi that night. and as details emerge about the relationship between miami dolphins player richie incognito and jonathan martin, we'll examine how the media has tackled the subject of bullying in the locker room and netflix's washington, d.c. set drama, "house of cards" just wrapped up filming season two. >> do you know how many people watch tmz? >> i couldn't care. >> that's why print journalism is dying. >>
Nov 17, 2013 8:00am PST
used to be a cia spokesman said here would be my question. if cbs were doing an investigation of malfeasance, would they accept an answer of we made a mistake. sorry. obviously not. why is this a sufficient response for them? >> i agree. it's not sufficient. you don't need an investigation to know certain things already. the source that they relied on was writing a book for one of the cbs publication companies. they didn't reveal that. i don't think we need an investigation to know that that should have been revealed and/or should have weighed heavily on them when they evaluated him. and the reason why the show is the gold standard is they have the luxury that a lot of reporters don't have which is time and resources and that makes the bigger they are, the harder they fall and it makes everything they're saying so much more important and they have to say what happened. >> there is and should be -- this is important for people to realize. a higher standard when you are alleging wrongdoing in your journalism. >> that's exactly right. and, you know, lynn's point is very important
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4